A BERKELEY ACTIVIST'S DIARY. week ending Oct.15
Once again there is a lot to cover as I pull the last two weeks on the local scene together. To ease the posting and reading here is Part I. Part 2 will follow on what is coming to us in more proposed zoning changes (housing).
The Tuesday 4 pm City Council Special Meeting on Legislative Systems Redesign was enough to make even attentive eyes glaze over. The mayor and Councilmember Hahn made the point at the meeting that Hahn’s proposal started on page 43 of the 138-page packet.
The meeting was nine minutes shy of two hours, started 42 minutes late and no action was taken. Most glaring in all this foolishness comes on page 95 of the 138-page packet, with the header “state or federal model” which appeared to be the basis for the layers of process.
It evidently did not occur to the team engrossed in the systems redesign (several of whom have left employment with the city of Berkeley) that the state legislative system has 40 state senators and 80 assembly members, and covers around 39,000,000 residents or that the federal system has 100 senators, 435 house members and covers 332,000,000 residents.
Berkeley has a mayor and eight councilmembers for the 123,562 of us living on the 10.5 square miles we call Berkeley. Without UC Berkeley students who now number over 40,000, Berkeley’s population would be well under 100,000.
It is not that what the city manager, city employees and city council do is unimportant, since it can be said that council actions can have a big impact on our daily life. Nor is it that committees aren’t useful, as there are occasions when committees are extremely useful in refining legislation. Nor is it that I am steadfastly opposed to committees in total. But I attend City Council Policy Committee meetings and watch the mayor and councilmembers in action. I have come to the conclusion that to create a complicated system for the few of the nine who actually submit major legislation seems a bit over the top.
-more-